What is the Achbita case?
In 2006, S. Achbita was fired when she started wearing a headscarf at work. The case came before the Labour Court of Antwerp (2009), the Court of Cassation (2015), the Court of Justice of the European Union (2017) and the Labour Court of Ghent (2020). Below you can find a full chronology.
In 2006, S. Achbita, a Muslim woman who had been working for the security firm G4S for three years, started wearing a headscarf. According to the personnel manager of G4S, the company had an unwritten neutrality policy. According to G4S, the headscarf was not compatible with the uniform receptionists had to wear to give them a 'recognisable and neutral look'. A negotiation attempt by Unia came to nothing, and Achbita lost her job.
Labour court of Antwerp
In 2009, Unia went to court. The court of Antwerp ruled that there was no direct discrimination on the basis of religion, because the law doesn’t protect the external manifestation of religion. Moreover, according to the court, it would be a legitimate objective for a company to show neutrality towards its clients and other employees.
2015: Question to the Court of Justice of the European Union
The Antwerp Labour Court largely confirmed the ruling. At Unia's insistence, the Court of Cassation asked the Court of Justice of the European Union on 9 March 2015 to clarify whether a general ban on the expression of beliefs in the workplace constitutes direct or indirect discrimination. Unia asked the question because the answer to this question determines what justification is available to the employer.
2017: judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union
The ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union followed on 14 March 2017.
A private company can only prohibit the headscarf for those workers who have visual contact with the customers. If the employer decides that the personnel need to have a neutral appearance, this policy must be applied in a coherent and systematic fashion, meaning not in response to a specific request from the customer. Finally, the employer must investigate whether employees who wish to openly wear religious insignia can be assigned to a different job, without any visual contact with the customers.
2020: judgment of the labour court of Ghent
On 12 October 2020, the Labour Court of Ghent decided that there was no discrimination in the case of Achbita vs. G4S. According to the labour court, a policy of neutrality does not disadvantage Muslim women who want to wear a headscarf more than other workers. According to the Labour Court, G4S should also not examine alternatives such as a transfer to a position without customer contact or a neutral headscarf.
More employment discrimination cases reported to Unia in 2017
Last year Unia opened a total of 2,017 cases of situations where people felt they were the subject of discrimination. This represents a 6% increase over 2016 (1,907 cases). Instances of employment discrimination were the most frequently opened cases at Unia.
Unia reacts to the report on discrimination by the Fundamental Rights Agency (FRA)
Out of all survey-respondents of North African and Turkish origin who experienced discrimination in the past year in Belgium, 20% said it had occurred on the job market, while the European average on this point is 12%. This figure was brought to Unia’s attention in the Second EU-MIDIS report by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).
The Achbita case before the court again
‘The Achbita case must be retried. The Court of Cassation has overturned the previous ruling of the Antwerp labour court because it inadequately examined whether Ms Achbita’s dismissal was discriminatory,’ Unia says.
The Achbita case: clarity about the headscarf ban in the workplace
A private company can only prohibit the headscarf for those workers who have visual contact with the customers. That is what the European Court of Justice ruled on March 14th.